Showing posts with label jackie nytes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jackie nytes. Show all posts

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Promises And Laddertrucks

At Monday night's City-County Council meeting, Councillor Jackie Nytes made a number of comments during the evening.  Two in particular I would like to address, as I think they are important issues and I hold a very different opinion than Councillor Nytes.  Gary Welsh took up a few of her comments and added his own thoughts over at Advance Indiana Monday night.

What I'd like to address in this blog entry are Nytes' comments made just before the IFD special district tax rate was approved.

Now, Councillor Nytes gets points from me for being quite consistent in the matter of more money for government.  She makes no bones about it and will ignore her caucus' position on matters when those matters will produce more revenue for some component of the City-County government or for downtown.  Her constituents knew her stand when they voted for her and she has not veered from that stand.  So, she gets points for that.  But, I heartily disagree with her comments and the underlying positions, nonetheless.

When then-Mayor Peterson was pushing consolidation of the various fire departments, critics claimed it would cost more, cause layoffs, and lead to township fire equipment and manpower shuffled into the old IFD district.  All that was pooh-poohed as untrue.  It was said that the merger would save money and lower taxes to boot.  When Ballard became mayor, he pushed consolidation even more fervently than Peterson had.  But, he dropped the claim that there were savings to be generated through consolidation, since the proof was abundant that it did not.  In fact, Mayor Ballard began to leave the merging township with the debt from their fire department and took the assets into IFD.

It seemed to me then and it still seems to me now, that the merger was just so township tax resources could be pulled in to help fund IFD.

Now we have the current affair of the proposed removal of ladder truck 21 from Station 21 in Washington Township, and within Councillor Christine Scales' district.  The College Commons neighborhood responded and have posted an informative letter online that I recommend folks read for the details.  One interesting paragraph lists the loss of services located in Washington Township since consolidation:
As stated above, Station 21's primary fire response has gone from 10 to 8, to very soon 4 firefighters. What else has the North-Side lost since consolidation with I.F.D.? Here are the fire/rescue services that were provided on the North-Side of Indianapolis and have since been removed by I.F.D. Remember, these services are now gone: The Hazardous Materials Team from Station 21, Heavy automobile extrication from Stations 4, 6 and 21, (They are still "light" extrication companies, but the heavy extrication comes from Station 14 at 30th and Capital.) Rope Rescue from Station 4, Medic 4 has been marked out of service, Ladder 17 has been marked out of service, The Ice Rescue Sled from Station 6 is gone (taken away the day after it was used to rescue a dog on the ice in a nationally televised story. It is now in storage collecting dust.), all of the engines and ladders in the former Washington Township response area were front line ALS (Advanced Life Support = paramedic) responders, (eight trucks in all) now only 2 are frontline ALS responders, and of course, come this December, Ladder 21 will be gone. Did you know this much has been taken away? Are you paying correspondingly less in taxes for having all of these services removed?
So, its not just a matter of the ladder truck - it is the decrease number of firefighters as well.

Nytes castigated the public and fellow Councillors to get with the new reality of the merged fire department.  Well... promises made were that this would not happen.  Those promises should be kept - not just what was written down in the merger documents.  AND it is the responsibility of a Councillor to advocate for and support the needs of their constituents.  Which is exactly what District 4 Councillor, Christine Scales, did in getting the decision to decommission Ladder Truck 21 reversed.

Here is another paragraph from the neighborhood organization's letter:
District 4 Councilor Christine Scales is working feverishly to try to organize the homeowner's associations in her area to act. She has spent countless hours on researching response times, NFPA standards, insurance ratings, actual driving distances and times between firehouses, and documentation of fire burning rates, as well as many other fire related statistics. She is fully against Ladder 21 being shut down. All of the officials contacted seem to be concerned, but no one is willing to act. She isn't the only person within the City Government working in your favor, but she is the most diligent.
Scales is a well regarded Councillor, not just in District 4, but throughout Indianapolis.  She does her homework on issues, and like Nytes, does not always follow her caucus if she believes it contrary to what is best for her constituents.  I have said it before and I will say it again.  Christine Scales is a gem of a Councillor.  Her work to restore Ladder 21 is just one more example of her indefatigable efforts on behalf of the residents of District 4.  Indy could use more Councillors just like her.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Games with COIT, LOIT, PST and Library Funding

I don't know what actually takes more slight of hand, the movement of dollars from one fund to another that are said not to be possible, or the explanation of why it can't be done in similar situations.  Fully funding the Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library is a prime example of this slight of hand.

Just last year, the City-County Council filled $1.0 million of a $1.8 million shortfall, with money laundered from the Ameriplex TIF District - money that had been sitting in the TIF District fund to act as a reserve to satisfy bond holders.  At the time, Councillors like President Ryan Vaughn, stated that they could not cover the remainder of the Library's shortfall with money from the Consolidated Downtown TIF District, even though it was exactly the same type of situation and even though they had just managed to pull $8 million a year from that TIF to pay more money to the Pacers.

Earlier this year, with much show and fanfare, the Council passed a resolution urging the Indiana State Legislature to grant them the power to send some County Option Income Tax revenues to the Library in future years.  The Legislature indicated that the City already had that power, but reaffirmed it with new legislation.  Now that the City and the Council has that power, Councillor Vaughn and others are making noises that indicate they will not split the COIT revenue with the Library anyway.

IBJ reporter, Francesca Jarosz, has a good article in the current IBJ that goes into the COIT - Library - IndyGo funding issue pretty well.  I agree with Councillor Jackie Nytes' position, captured in the final two paragraphs of the piece:
Jackie Nytes, a council Democrat, said giving the library even a small share of income taxes this year is important in setting a precedent.


“We recognize there is a need as a show of faith to find a way to begin that sharing of income taxes,” Nytes said, “even if the initial allocation may be more symbolic than substantive.”
I decided to look at the 2011 City-County budget to see where the City and County income tax money was going, just to see what I found.  I looked at the budget breakdown "2011 Council Adopted Revenues by Subobject by Fund" and "2011 Council Adopted Revenues by Fund by Subobject".  Click here for page with links to a variety of ways to dissect the budget.
 
But, first, a step back to explain that there are three separate taxes revenue streams that combine to total all of the income tax collected in Marion County.  There is the County Option Income Tax (COIT).  There is the Local Option Income Tax Property Tax Make Up (LOIT).  There is the Public Safety Option Income Tax (PST).  Some will tell you that the PST is dedicated to public safety an cannot under any circumstances be used for anything else.  But, that is not the case and in 2010 it was in fact redirected for use anywhere on anything to benefit the final City-County budget both in 2010 and in 2011.
 
In 2010, $21.1 m of COIT money and $13.3 m of PST money were put into the County Rainy Day Fund, where they were essentially laundered so that they could be used for any expense.  $17.3 m was transferred out that year and $17.5 m transferred out to benefit the entire budget.
 
So, for just 2011, how is COIT, LOIT, and PST being spent?
 
COIT:
Fire fund -- $40.4 m
IMPD fund -- $79.2 m
County General Fund -- $6.4 m
MECA fund -- $6.8 m
 
LOIT:
Consolidated County fund -- $2.6 m
Parks fund -- $2.1 m
Redevelopment fund -- $55 k
Solid Waste Collection fund -- $3.1 m
Fire fund -- $8.8 m
IMPD Fund -- $4.8 m
County General Fund -- $13.9 m
 
PST:
Public Safety Income Tax fund (from City's take of PST) -- $29.9 m 
Public Safety Income Tax fund (from County's take of PST) -- $20.6 m
 
These funds are then the sources of money that go into each departmental budget.  The grand total of income tax revenues for the City-County in 2011 comes to $218 million.  Surely the Library is important enough to the powers that be, regardless of party, to send less than 1% of the income tax revenue to help make Indianapolis a great place to live.
 
But, somehow I expect there will be more slight of hand trying to explain why COIT, LOIT, and PST cannot be shared with the Library than prestidigitation in making it happen.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

TIF Districts - The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly - Part 3

In this part 3 of the TIF District series, I'd like to share some links that provide further information - some of which is authored by folks you'll be familiar with.

MKNA blog on TIF districts -- (current) as part of an educational process as the Meridian Kessler Neighborhood Association deliberates on the potential for a TIF area landing in their neighborhood

South Bend Tribune "Good tool, but..." -- (2011) brings up pro and con TIF district points

Baker & Daniels "Tax Increment Finance in Indiana" -- (pdf created in 2008, document undated)  authored by Melina Kennedy and posted on CDFA.net, a pro-public-private partnership and pro-tax-financing group (thanks to Yoda, who cited this document in the MKNA blog)

CDFA overview of TIF history and types  -- (2008) authored by Jackie Nytes and posted on CDFA.net, a pro-public-private-partnership and pro-tax-financing group -- has county map showing location of TIF districts at that time

An IBJ article "City reviews TIF districts" -- (2008) wherein Mayor Greg Ballard criticizes former Mayor Bart Peterson's TIF district policy as overreaching and some TIF districts having overlived their usefulness

Neareastside HOTIF FAQs -- (2006) written on City of Indianapolis, Mayor Bart Peterson, letterhead



If you have other links, please provide them to me and I'll edit this entry (hadenoughindy@gmail.com)

TIF Districts - The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly - Part 1

TIF Districts - The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly - Part 2