My top spot for most common sense recommendation is that all TIFs should have an end date when they are dissolved entirely.
The current situation is that 11 of Indy's 33 TIF districts have end dates and 22 do not. No word on the status of the 12 TIFs in the excluded Cities. Three of Indy's TIFs are classified as 'dormant', meaning all property taxes generated by them is flowing through to the taxing units for the time being. They can be recalled to service at any time by a mere vote of the MDC, as two were last year. All new TIFs must, by state law, have an end date of no more than 25 years.
Here is the exact recommendation of the TIF Study Commission:
I would wholeheartedly agree with each aspect of this recommendation. The promise that we will all eventually benefit from the economic development or redevelopment of a TIF district can and should be fulfilled by letting them expire and all revenues flow as regular tax dollars. This would lower everyone's property taxes and, at the same time, add more dollars to the schools, library, townships, etc, by lowering the number of people who hit the tax caps.h. Establish Sunset Dates for all TIFs. The Commission recommends the following with respect to TIF districts that are dormant or have no mandatory expiration:
i. Dormant TIF districts: In the absence of overwhelming justification otherwise, the Commission recommends the termination of all three dormant TIF districts.
ii. TIF districts with no required sunset date: In the absence of overwhelming justification otherwise, the Commission recommends the establishment of termination dates based on the last maturity date of the related bonds.
iii. TIF districts without outstanding debt and which are used on a pay-as-you-go basis: in concert with appropriate community development organizations and in alignment with a comprehensive planning document, the MDC should establish a capital spending plan and sunset date no longer than 20 years into the future.
There is little distinction between the perpetual TIF district and a slush fund for a sitting Mayor from which he/she can dole out favors.
1 comment:
Amen. If government can't keep enough police on the streets or even toilet paper in their precincts, then promoting corporate interests with TIFs is an unaffordable luxury. To not even end-date them is a slap in the face to taxpayers who can little afford them in the first place. They're the contemporary replacement for mob "protection money": gritting your teeth as the politician in-question gets his corporate support at reelection time.
Post a Comment