Amy
Hillenburg, editor and reporter at the
Mooresville-Decatur Times, has a piece in Saturday's edition entitled "
Resident wonders whose land is it anyway?" (you will need a subscription to view). The article centers around a claim by the
MSD Decatur Township that it owns land that River Run residents had been told was their common area.
Given my role in land use issues here in Decatur Township, Hillenburg asked me about this situation. Information was still evolving in the last few days and even hours before the article went to press.
Bottom line - the school district is mistaken when it claims to own this common area.
First a little background. The River Run subdivision was zoned and developed by Crossmann Communities. Eventually, the Crossmann company was bought by Beazer Homes. River Run extends from Epler Avenue on the north to Mills Road on the south and from Mann Road on the east to the Old Mill Park subdivision on the west. In 1998, Crossmann and the district did a land swap - 14 acres then owned by Crossmann that had extensive Mann Road frontage was swapped for 14 acres then owned by the district that had frontage on Epler Avenue. This exchange gave the district a second entrance for what became the Decatur Intermediate School, and it gave River Run a wider northern area, more suitable for development. In 1999 these swapped acres were rezoned to the appropriate land use categories through petition 99-Z-32. This was all before Don Stinson became Superintendent.
Since then the new acres in River Run were platted and built. Common areas are scattered throughout the development, but the one in question is about 1.5 acres and abuts the southwest corner of the Intermediate School property and is on the north side of the area where Dollar Run Lane, Sweet River Drive and Dollar Forge Lane all converge.
The district claims that they own this common area. But, all documents obtained fromt the City differ with that conclusion.
Lets start with the Assessor's records. Greg Bowes, Marion County Assessor, tells me that his records show the legal owner to be the River Run Homeowners Association and that the last transaction involving that property was a transfer of ownership from Crossmann Community Partners to the HOA in 2004.
I also made inquiries of staff in Division of Planning, Department of Metropolitan Development. One particularly helpful piece of information was provided to me by Linda
Ahlbrand, Principal Planner II, who generated a
GIS layered map of the area. I have uploaded it to Google Docs (
click here to view) and there is a smaller version below.
The northern end of the River Run subdivision is shown, along with the school property and some abutting properties. The green shaded area is the common area parcel that is in dispute. The red-striped areas are the two 14-acre parcels that were swapped in 1998 and rezoned in 1999. The red-striped areas were generated by the computer, based upon the legal description of the property provided for the rezoning. As you can see, the bulk of the common area was owned by Crossmann even before the land swap. The little spike on the north side of the common area was transferred to Crossmann due to the land swap.
At this point it is clear to me that this common area is owned by the River Run HOA and not the school district. If the district continues to make claims on its ownership, then it needs to prove the ascertain. But, I believe they are simply mistaken.
[August 31, 2010 - edited to add - in speaking with a neighbor in this area, it is clear that the property being discussed is not this 1.5 acre common area. Rather it is a 5 or more acre area to the north that lies between the homes in River Run and a creek or stream that runs through the school property. Why the school district thinks that this is linked to the land swap is not clear at all, as this property would have been zoned for school use and owned by the district well before, during, and after the swap. In addition, the district could not sell or transfer for free, any property it owned unless two independent appraisals determined its value at zero dollars. It is difficult to imagine that any valid appraisal would determine that a 5 plus acre parcel, with frontage on a busy street, is zero. Nor, it is clear that the district could preselect the buyer of such a property. Below is a map of the area. The 5 acre parcel is the land laying between the homes, which I highlighted with a red line, and the blue line that denotes a stream.
-- end edit]
Posts
